The part of colorectal recovery you can't see, and why it matters
In colorectal surgery, the surgical outcomes themselves can be well measured. They are the metrics that tend to define how we talk about surgical quality. But ask a different question, and the data often runs out...

Prof. Andreas Obermair
2
min read
•
News

In colorectal surgery, the surgical outcomes themselves can be well measured. Complication rates, length of stay, readmissions, returns to theatre: these can be tracked, audited and discussed. They are the metrics that tend to define how we talk about surgical quality.
But ask a different question, and the data often runs out.
How is your patient actually functioning six months after their resection? Has their bowel function settled? Their continence? Their quality of life?
For many surgeons, the honest answer is that they do not know, not because they do not care, but because there has never been a practical way to find out.
That is the blind spot at the centre of long-term surgical outcomes. And for colorectal surgeons working outside a structured national audit, whether that is a General Surgeon who is the only one covering colorectal work in a regional hospital, or a colorectal surgeon in private practice, the gap is wider still.
You may have a precise record of what happened in theatre and in the time up to discharge; and almost no structured picture of what happened in the weeks and months that follow.
We built the new SurgicalPerformance Colorectal module to close that gap.
Capturing what usually goes unrecorded
The recovery that matters most to patients happens after they leave your care, which is precisely when it becomes hardest to observe. Operative outcomes are captured in the moment. Patient-reported outcomes are not, unless something is actively set up to collect them.
The Colorectal module collects patient-reported outcomes automatically over time, using SMS-based follow-up surveys sent to your patients at relevant intervals. Those responses flow back into a single dashboard, sitting alongside your operative and clinical data.
Instead of two disconnected views, the clinical and the human, you get one continuous picture of care, from the procedure through to recovery.
This is the difference between assuming a patient has recovered well and actually knowing it.
Follow-up that does not add to your workload
The most common reason long-term outcomes go uncaptured is not indifference. It is time. Few surgeons have the administrative capacity to manually chase follow-up surveys around a full operating list and a busy clinic.
The platform is designed around that constraint. With Quick Case, you or your rooms can start a case and schedule its patient-reported outcome surveys in seconds, and a full case can be entered in under two minutes. From there, the follow-up runs on its own. Patients are surveyed automatically, and the results return to your dashboard without further effort. The intention to track outcomes finally meets a process that makes it realistic.
From data to understanding
Capturing the data is the starting point. The value is in what it lets you see.
With your outcomes in one place, over time and across your practice, you can begin to identify trends you might otherwise miss, the subtle patterns that only become visible when individual cases are viewed together. You can benchmark your outcomes against anonymised peers, giving context to your own numbers. And you can draw on that record to support audit, CPD and quality-improvement activities, with evidence rather than recollection.
It also changes the conversations you have with patients. When you can speak to recovery using real, longitudinal data from comparable cases, you are no longer relying on general expectations. You are drawing on your own outcomes, which is a more honest and more useful basis for informed consent and for managing expectations.
Built for the way colorectal surgeons actually work
Not every colorectal-operating surgeon has access to a structured outcomes registry, and even those who do often find that the patient-reported side of recovery is the piece that is missing. The Colorectal module is built for that reality: a way to understand your own outcomes, on your own terms, whether or not you sit within a formal audit programme.
It reflects the wider SurgicalPerformance approach. Capture what is happening across your practice. Understand what the data is telling you. Improve on the basis of evidence rather than assumption. The platform is private to you, designed for reflection rather than external reporting, and built by surgeons who understand the clinical context.
Try the Colorectal module
The best way to see whether this fits your practice is to use it. You can try SurgicalPerformance risk free with a 10-case trial, with no credit card required to sign up. Add your first cases, schedule your patient-reported outcomes, and start building a picture of recovery that, until now, has been difficult to see.
Start your 10-case trial


